I always had a pretty accurate idea as to why I love knockers. Tits are awesome. So I did a little bit of internet research and found out that the male obsession with women’s breasts is bang on what I thought.

Men find breasts calming

In a linear world full of hard edges and harder realities, breasts are soft, welcoming and non-threatening . With their obvious connection to breast-feeding, and by extension childhood, breasts remind us of our halcyon days when our mothers protected us from all the world’s evils.

Breasts are a symbol of fertility

A-cup or Z-cup, breasts define femininity in the same way that channel surfing and participating in fantasy sports leagues define masculinity. Breasts hint at a woman’s ability to nurture and sustain life. They also point to a woman’s capacity to breed, as they signal the onset of puberty. It’s for this reason that we can find Pamela Anderson’s breasts alluring while we can be disgusted by Ned Beatty’s floppy man tits in Deliverance (sorry Ned).

It’s a matter of natural selection

According to Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution, we subconsciously select partners who are healthy and appear capable of reproduction — all of which explains why the frail Darwin had so much time to write books rather than go out on dates.

According to his research, men are attracted to bazooms (especially the more shapely variety) because they are indicative of a strong constitution and an ability to further propagate the species. Although reproduction is no longer our top priority, this instinct remains despite centuries of evolution (much like our own nipples).

So there we have it ladies… it’s a natural thing when we stare at your tits.  Don’t take it personal, don’t get uppity, don’t get stuck up, don’t get offended.  Just realise we are only doing what comes instinctively.  We can’t help it if we happen to like acting instinctively

When someone said the words ‘Miley Cyrus’ it used to conjure up images of teeny-bopper posters plastered over white America’s teen bedrooms.  Something seems to have changed for Miley.  In her latest video ‘Can’t Be Tamed’ she’s scantily clad with an overpowering ‘feel’ of sexual provocative dancing. Check the video of a live performance…

For those in England this isn’t socially abhorrent because we’ve been brought up our entire lives being told the age of consent is 16 and people are able to make their own choices when it comes to boning.  In North America it’s far more socially unacceptable because over here people seem to think a 16 year old person cannot make informed choices on who they want to bang.  With a video like this… does anyone realistically expect any normal guy of any age to not want to slip her one?  Is the average guy at fault when he sees images like these, and gets aroused wanting to bang a 16yr dressed like this?  Or is it the fault of her record company and Miley’s dad failing to exercise some parental control?

Either way… there is not a freezie’s chance in hell I would ever let my own daughter dress and dance like this.  You can bet your ass my daughter would be tamed and if she dressed like this would get a slap upside the head and told to go and get dressed.  It’s just messed up that teeny-boppers sooner or later always ‘sell out’ to a more sexual image.

A vote for Labour is a vote to keep that Muppet Brown in Number 10. If you do, don’t you dare ever complain about the man who has done more damage to England since 1997 than Hitler ever did, both at home and abroad, flushes our once proud country down the crapper.

We were a World power when Blair came to power and once again Labour have left the country not as they found it, but on its back with it’s legs in the air like America’s bitch.

A sign of progress – its awesome that U.S Navy female personnel can now do their thing on submarines just like the blokes.  I originally blogged about it saying that the two men are just as likely to have sexual relations on a submarine, as a woman and a man would so it made no sense to ban women at all.

But now it’s official – Robert Gates made it happen.  The whole ban in the first place was completely stupid – it called into question a person’s professionalism based upon their gender which is discrimination.  Gender discrimination hasn’t got a place in the 21st century’s military.

One of the good things about having had a relationship with someone who became Chief is that I have gained a insight into how First Nation politics work.  The other good thing is I don’t get along with my former partner. I can quite happily state it exactly like it is without putting across a biased point of view… hell she doesn’t  even know I wrote this, although I’m sure she soon will.   Not many people will believe that – they can suck eggs for all I care.

I have a vested interest in what happens out there and so I’m going to state issues exactly as I see them.  For instance… the first prequisite I believe a Chief needs to have is solid and secure ties to the community.  Someone who lives there… someone who’s children live and play there… someone who is in an integral part of their own family.

Strong Ties to the Community

A perfectly valid argument could be made that people who live off-reserve through no fault of their own, and who are still active in the community should be given a fair chance at being elected.

People who voluntarily have spent the best part of their lives (as well as their children’s lives) off reserve, making NO attempt to become involved with the community and willingly become estranged from their own family for twenty years simply shouldn’t be elected (in my opinion) -  no Johnny-Come-Lately for Chief.

Band Elections allow any Band Member to apply for Council and anybody (including non-First Nation people) to run for Chief; but it simply does not make sense to vote for someone who doesn’t have strong ties to the community.  An independent non-First Nation elections officer should be appointed to determine whether a person’s ties to the community are strong enough before being eligible to run for Chief.

Personal Qualities of a Chief

If a person can spend twenty years acting like strangers towards their own blood – what’s to say they won’t start to have that detached uncaring attitude towards the people they’re supposed to be leading?

One thing you can’t question about Lorraine’s character is her family values.  It’s not like she’s masquerading as a family orientated Chief – who has had five children and abandoned her two oldest.  A Chief should care about everyone including ALL their own children.

Current Administration Achievements

I mean… the proof is in the pudding, right? Some of the achievements of the current Chief and Council are:

• Housing – two 5bedroom houses & two 3bedroom houses have been built this last year.
• Dalles Road – the 1st phase of the road reconstruction has been finished, with them starting the 2nd phase which will bring the road up to provincial standards.
• Building good-will and partnerships with other local First Nations.  For instance; the Miitigoog Corporation – a partnership with Naotkamegwanning and Wabaseemoong has set up potential for a LOT of added revenue for all three reserves.
• Building and overseeing of a $4.5million water plant which has brought jobs into the community.
• The Ontario Power Generation settlement (which is public knowledge for all haters out there).
• and most importantly of all… the 500lb gorilla of rez politics:
  

  NO MORE CO-MANAGEMENT!

  According to public records Dalles has been in co-management since 1993, and every single Chief & Council since then has put the community further and further in debt.  Co-management is debilitating for a community and the effects of it will take a few years to recover from, I should imagine.

For real… like what achievements have the other candidates done for the community?  You don’t need to be living on the reserve OR to be a member of Chief and Council, or an employee of the Band to do something for your people.  What have the other candidates done?

Some of the people on the reserve at times were downright spiteful, vindictive, jealous and purely hateful – but Lorraine would still help in any way she could.  Anyone who says she doesn’t care about the people and the community are simply f**king idiots – doing her job non-stop was a factor in some almost life-threatening health problems a while back.

The reversal of co-management, and the OPG settlement rumoured to have been an eight figured sum are two facts which will have very long lasting positive effects on the community my children are growing up in.

Ochiichagwe’Babigo’Ining Ojibway Nation have a  good leader and a stable council – if progress is to keep happening, it’d be a real stupid move to change things now.